AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Backtrack c81/4/2024 I'm gonna look into the AWUS036NH now though.īSS c8:3a:35:53:7b:28 (on wlan1) - associatedĬapability: ESS Privacy ShortSlotTime (0x0411) Give me a tough time when I try to switch between Kali and Windows (virtual) and with occasionally break resulting in an unplug and plug and a disconnect/connect back to the guest.Īlso, I now have problems with my TP-Link WN722N card (maybe there are compatibility issues now?) Fix for me is to have it unplugged though when i boot up my physical machine and and my virtual windows 7. I also got a TP-Link with an atheros chipset, which worked seamlessly, so I figured I'll switch to an 'upgraded' alfa card, the 36NHA as it had the same chipset.oh man, started having the same problems as I did with the 36NHR. But the range can be fied with a new antenna on ones with less of a range. Right meow I have the 36H as being the most reliable and like you said, best range. Haven't tried it with 8 yet because I got a different card all together. Then once I finally got it working, Windows 7 crashed. I have to install, uninstall, check off the windows auto update function so I can manually install the driver from the CD. I have an ALFA 36NHR and it crashed by computer while being a pain to get the right drivers. Please don't bother mentioning the older 'H' ('g' mode only) and 'NHR' (total headache for Kali/Backtrack) as the former will barely appeal to anyone and no one in the right mind would purchase the latter. I tried really hard to accurately and helpfully label the devices to avoid confusion because there is really a lot of them. Whilst it seems to work, and there is even that linked tutorial on how it works, and the writer swears by it. But it's quite a shot in the dark at this point. Which is why the latter '51NH' doesn't seem like it would be a bad choice. As I want of course the best all-rounder, and I wish there was something that had awesome range, fast deauth and handshake and also of course was dual-band. The '51NH' is dual-band and supports 5Ghz wireless and 300Mpbs but little to nothing is known about it at all. (Some people have reported the range as being terrible) The 'NHA' is better for cracking and such, but lacks the range. I mean at this point it seems obvious that the 'NH' is best for range, whilst still being able to use the 'n' wireless standard. So my question guys obviously is, which of these is the best? Also an overwhelming amount of people returned them for just the NH. AWUS036NH R - This thing apparently has massive driver issues, and is 100x more trouble than it's worth. Apparently it has the best range of any of the cards. AWUS036H - (the non-n) variant, older adapter. Though there is no proven or even really any written info that it works with Kali out of the box, or what it's strengths and weaknesses are.Ĭards that I have not, and will not mention:ġ. Plus that the new V2 model has a different driver. Except that apparently the older model was terrible for packet injection and etc. Though, however I cannot find ANYWHERE any sort of decent description as to what the difference is between the newer and older models. In addition to this there's also this newer: AWUS036NH R V2 But I can still find it around on some sites. In addition apparently this model is discontinued? (See 'Step 2'). Though depending on the location I am pretty sure there's a bit of legal-issues involved there anyway. I have found a post that it's plug and play and works fine, but that there are issues getting all the bands. Though, however there is almost no information that I can find on how well it works with Kali. The: AWUS0 51NH is a Dual-band card that operates at a/b/g/n and at 150Mbps and 300Mbps. That means they only support up to 150Mbps. Now, neither of these cards are Dual-band cards. Though, however the 'AWUS036NH A' was far better at deauth and grabbing handshakes more reliably in low db (decibel) situations (even as low as 10db). The 'AWUS036 NH' was unbeatable in terms of range. Hey guys back again with the SAME question.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |